Arylamine-DNA adduct conformation in relation to mutagenesis

Frederick A. Beland, William B. Melchior, Luísa L.G. Mourato, M. Amélia Santos, M. Matilde Marques

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

30 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

A considerable body of evidence has indicated that local conformational alterations induced by DNA adducts may provide the molecular basis for differences in mutational specificities exhibited by structurally similar adducts. To elucidate the relationships between adduct structure and mutation induction, the ability of several single-ring arylamines present in tobacco smoke (i.e., methylanilines, dimethylanilines, and ethylanilines) to form DNA adducts was investigated. In all cases, the major adducts were C8-substituted deoxyguanosine derivatives, which is consistent with what has been observed with more carcinogenic arylamines, such as 2-aminofluorene and 4-aminobiphenyl. Spectroscopic and theoretical data on the adducts indicated conformational differences depending upon the location of the alkyl substituents. Adducts containing alkyl groups ortho to the amine function (e.g., 2-methylaniline) had a greater percentage of syn conformers about the glycosyl bond than those not bearing such groups. Arylamines with ortho alkyl substituents tend to be more mutagenic and tumorigenic than analogues not containing an ortho alkyl substituent. This increase in biological activity may be due in part to the greater propensity of ortho alkylated adducts to adopt a syn conformation.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)13-19
Number of pages7
JournalMutation Research - Fundamental and Molecular Mechanisms of Mutagenesis
Volume376
Issue number1-2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 12 May 1997
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • Arylamine
  • Conformation
  • DNA adduct
  • Ethylaniline
  • Methylaniline
  • Mutogenesis
  • N-Acyloxy arylamine
  • N-Hydroxy arylamine
  • Nuclear magnetic resonance

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Arylamine-DNA adduct conformation in relation to mutagenesis'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this