Authors, peer reviewers, and readers: What is expected from each player in collaborative publishing?

Pharmacy Practice 2020 peer reviewers

Research output: Contribution to journalEditorial

11 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Scholarly publishing is in a crisis, with the many stakeholders complaining about different aspects of the system. Authors want fast publication times, high visibility and publications in high-impact journals. Readers want freely accessible, high-quality articles. Peer reviewers want recognition for the work they perform to ensure the quality of the published articles. However, authors, peer reviewers, and readers are three different roles played by the same group of individuals, the users of the scholarly publishing system—and this system could work based on a collaborative publishing principle where “nobody pays, and nobody gets paid”.

Original languageEnglish
Article number2284
Pages (from-to)1-6
Number of pages6
JournalPharmacy Practice
Volume19
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jan 2021
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • Cooperative Behavior
  • Open Access Publishing
  • Peer Review, Research
  • Periodicals as Topic

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Authors, peer reviewers, and readers: What is expected from each player in collaborative publishing?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this