Abstract
Objectives: This study aims to evaluate the cytotoxicity and genotoxicity of three different extracts obtained from Filtek™ One Bulk Fill, Tetric Evoceram® Bulk Fill and Coltene Fill-Up! resins. Materials and methods: The cytotoxicity was determined on 3T3 fibroblast cells using the MTT and crystal violet assays. The genotoxicity was determined using a cytokinesis-block micronucleus assay. Results: The cytotoxicity of the resin extracts on 3T3 mouse fibroblasts was found to be dose-dependent with both the MTT and crystal violet assays. Extracts concentrated above 1% were cytotoxic according to the MTT assay. The Filtek™ One Bulk Fill, Tetric Evoceram® Bulk Fill, and Coltene Fill-Up! resins reached the LD50 at concentrations of 60%, 50%, and 20%, respectively, and showed genotoxicity rates that were 2–5 times, 3–8 times, and 4–15 times higher than the negative control, respectively. Conclusions: Coltene Fill-Up! resin extracts were the most cytotoxic and genotoxic, followed by Tetric Evoceram® Bulk Fill and Filtek™ One Bulk Fill. Clinical relevance: The analyzed bulk-fill resins showed differences in in vitro biocompatibility, and the Filtek™ One Bulk Fill was found to be the safest for clinical use.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 7851-7858 |
| Number of pages | 8 |
| Journal | Clinical Oral Investigations |
| Volume | 27 |
| Issue number | 12 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - Dec 2023 |
Keywords
- Bulk fill
- Crystal violet assay
- Cytokinesis-block micronucleus assay
- MTT assay
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Biocompatibility of bulk-fill resins in vitro'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver