Dental tissue-derived stem cell sheet biotechnology for periodontal tissue regeneration: A systematic review

Fabiana Divina Magalhães, Giovanna Sarra, Giovanna Lopes Carvalho, Ana Clara Fagundes Pedroni, Márcia Martins Marques, Leandro Chambrone, Thaís Gimenez, Maria Stella Moreira

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

17 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objective: This study aimed to conduct a systematic review of the use of a cell sheet formed by mesenchymal stem cells derived from dental tissues (ddMSCs) for periodontal tissue regeneration in animal models in comparison with any other type of regenerative treatment. Design: PubMed and Scopus databases were searched for relevant studies up to December 2020. The review was conducted based on the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analysis guidelines. Results: Of the 1542 potentially relevant articles initially identified, 33 fulfilled the eligibility criteria and were considered for this review. Even with a wide variety of selected study methods, the periodontal tissue was always regenerated; this indicates the potential for the use of these cell sheets in the future of periodontics. However, this regeneration process is not always complete. Conclusion: Despite the implantation, ddMSCs sheets have a great potential to be used in the regeneration of periodontal tissue. More in vivo studies should be conducted using standardized techniques for cell sheet implantation to obtain more robust evidence of the relevance of using this modality of cell therapy for periodontal tissue regeneration.

Original languageEnglish
Article number105182
JournalArchives of Oral Biology
Volume129
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Sept 2021
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • Cell sheet
  • Dental tissue-derived
  • Periodontal tissue
  • Stem cells
  • Tissue engineering
  • Tissue regeneration

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Dental tissue-derived stem cell sheet biotechnology for periodontal tissue regeneration: A systematic review'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this