TY - JOUR
T1 - Effectiveness of a 3D bikefitting method in riding pain, fatigue, and comfort
T2 - a randomized controlled clinical trial
AU - Dias Scoz, Robson
AU - Rui de Oliveira, Paulo
AU - Chamorro Pelegrina, Claudinei
AU - Hespanhol, Luiz
AU - Augusto Melo-Silva, Cesar
AU - Filipe Teixeira de Júdice, André
AU - João Baltazar Mendes, José
AU - Maia Alves Ferreira, Luciano
AU - Ferreira Amorim, Cesar
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2022 International Society of Biomechanics in Sports.
PY - 2022
Y1 - 2022
N2 - To investigate the effects of bike fitting compared to qualitative-based riding posture recommendations on comfort, fatigue, and pain in amateur cyclists. This was a randomised controlled parallel trial of 162 amateur cyclists divided into two groups: bike fitting group (BFG)–participants received a bike fitting session based on 3D kinematic assessments; and a control group (QG)–participants who received a handout containing qualitative-based cycling posture recommendations. Primary outcomes were perceived comfort (FEEL Scale), perceived fatigue (OMNI Scale), and perceived pain (numeric rating pain scale, NRPS). Outcomes were assessed at baseline, when the interventions were delivered, and after 15 days. Intention-to-treat analyses were conducted using student t-tests between pre and post intervention on both groups. All dependent variables from BFG displayed significant statistical difference between both groups post-intervention (p < 0.05). FEEL Scale and OMNI Scale results showed the highest changes of all variables under analysis (mean differences of 3.12 and 3.95 points, respectively); while the body parts with more reduction in riding pain were Groin and Back (mean differences of 1.68 and 1.35, respectively). In conclusion, 3D kinematic bikefit demonstrated superior improvements over riding pain, comfort and fatigue compared to qualitative riding posture recommendations.
AB - To investigate the effects of bike fitting compared to qualitative-based riding posture recommendations on comfort, fatigue, and pain in amateur cyclists. This was a randomised controlled parallel trial of 162 amateur cyclists divided into two groups: bike fitting group (BFG)–participants received a bike fitting session based on 3D kinematic assessments; and a control group (QG)–participants who received a handout containing qualitative-based cycling posture recommendations. Primary outcomes were perceived comfort (FEEL Scale), perceived fatigue (OMNI Scale), and perceived pain (numeric rating pain scale, NRPS). Outcomes were assessed at baseline, when the interventions were delivered, and after 15 days. Intention-to-treat analyses were conducted using student t-tests between pre and post intervention on both groups. All dependent variables from BFG displayed significant statistical difference between both groups post-intervention (p < 0.05). FEEL Scale and OMNI Scale results showed the highest changes of all variables under analysis (mean differences of 3.12 and 3.95 points, respectively); while the body parts with more reduction in riding pain were Groin and Back (mean differences of 1.68 and 1.35, respectively). In conclusion, 3D kinematic bikefit demonstrated superior improvements over riding pain, comfort and fatigue compared to qualitative riding posture recommendations.
KW - Kinematics
KW - bicycling
KW - bikefit
KW - ergonomics
KW - sports
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85142506061&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1080/14763141.2022.2140701
DO - 10.1080/14763141.2022.2140701
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85142506061
SN - 1476-3141
JO - Sports Biomechanics
JF - Sports Biomechanics
ER -