TY - JOUR
T1 - Efficacy of preprocedural mouthrinses in the reduction of microorganisms in aerosol
T2 - A systematic review
AU - Marui, Vanessa Costa
AU - Souto, Maria Luisa Silveira
AU - Rovai, Emanuel Silva
AU - Romito, Giuseppe Alexandre
AU - Chambrone, Leandro
AU - Pannuti, Claudio Mendes
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2019 American Dental Association
PY - 2019/12
Y1 - 2019/12
N2 - Background: The authors of this systematic review aimed to evaluate the efficacy of preprocedural mouthrinses in reducing the number of microorganisms disseminated by means of the aerosol generated via dental procedures when compared with a placebo, water, or no mouthrinse. Types of Studies Reviewed: The authors included only randomized clinical trials. They searched MEDLINE (PubMed), Embase, Google Scholar, and Latin American and Caribbean Health Sciences Literature databases through May 31, 2019. They performed random-effects meta-analysis for reduction of the number of colony-forming units (CFU) in the dental aerosol. Results: Of 770 potentially relevant articles, the authors included 13 randomized clinical trials in which researchers studied the efficacy of chlorhexidine, essential oils, cetylpyridinium chloride, and herbal products. Meta-analysis of 12 studies showed that mouthrinses with chlorhexidine, essential oils, and cetylpyridinium chloride significantly reduced the number of CFU. Overall, the use of a preprocedural mouthrinse resulted in a mean reduction in the number of CFUs of 64.8% (95% confidence interval, 50.4% to 79.3%; I2 = 37%) compared with control. None of the included studies presented a low risk of bias. Practical Implications: Some dental procedures result in dissemination of microorganisms in the aerosol in the dental office. There is moderate evidence that preprocedural mouthrinses significantly reduce the number of microorganisms in the dental aerosol.
AB - Background: The authors of this systematic review aimed to evaluate the efficacy of preprocedural mouthrinses in reducing the number of microorganisms disseminated by means of the aerosol generated via dental procedures when compared with a placebo, water, or no mouthrinse. Types of Studies Reviewed: The authors included only randomized clinical trials. They searched MEDLINE (PubMed), Embase, Google Scholar, and Latin American and Caribbean Health Sciences Literature databases through May 31, 2019. They performed random-effects meta-analysis for reduction of the number of colony-forming units (CFU) in the dental aerosol. Results: Of 770 potentially relevant articles, the authors included 13 randomized clinical trials in which researchers studied the efficacy of chlorhexidine, essential oils, cetylpyridinium chloride, and herbal products. Meta-analysis of 12 studies showed that mouthrinses with chlorhexidine, essential oils, and cetylpyridinium chloride significantly reduced the number of CFU. Overall, the use of a preprocedural mouthrinse resulted in a mean reduction in the number of CFUs of 64.8% (95% confidence interval, 50.4% to 79.3%; I2 = 37%) compared with control. None of the included studies presented a low risk of bias. Practical Implications: Some dental procedures result in dissemination of microorganisms in the aerosol in the dental office. There is moderate evidence that preprocedural mouthrinses significantly reduce the number of microorganisms in the dental aerosol.
KW - Mouthrinses
KW - aerosols
KW - cetylpyridinium chloride
KW - chlorhexidine
KW - cross-infection
KW - dental office
KW - essential oils
KW - microorganisms
KW - preprocedural
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85075076527&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.adaj.2019.06.024
DO - 10.1016/j.adaj.2019.06.024
M3 - Review article
C2 - 31761015
AN - SCOPUS:85075076527
SN - 0002-8177
VL - 150
SP - 1015-1026.e1
JO - Journal of the American Dental Association
JF - Journal of the American Dental Association
IS - 12
ER -