Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Randomized double-blind study on safety and tolerability of TP-102 phage cocktail in patients with infected and non-infected diabetic foot ulcers

  • Ran Nir-Paz
  • , Hadil Onallah
  • , Michal Dekel
  • , Yechiel N. Gellman
  • , Amir Haze
  • , Ronen Ben-Ami
  • , Ron Braunstein
  • , Ronen Hazan
  • , Danna Dror
  • , Yonatan Oster
  • , Meir Cherniak
  • , Fabienne Attal
  • , Ana Raquel Barbosa
  • , Helena Dordio
  • , Alexandra Wagner
  • , Daniela Jones-Dias
  • , José Neves
  • , Margarida Barreto
  • , Clara Leandro
  • , Sofia Côrte-Real
  • Miguel Garcia

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

22 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: Phage therapy offers a promising alternative for treating serious infections, including diabetic foot ulcers (DFUs), through the lytic action of phages. This randomized double-blind study was conducted to evaluate the safety and tolerability of the TP-102 bacteriophage cocktail in patients with DFUs non-infected and infected with Staphylococcus aureus, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and/or Acinetobacter baumannii. Methods: Nineteen participants with DFUs were randomized after susceptibility testing. TP-102 was applied topically at 10⁹ plaque-forming units (PFUs)/mL/cm³ to the target ulcer: 1 week for non-infected DFUs and 28 days for infected DFUs (PEDIS grade 2/3). The study was conducted in Israel. Findings: Main outcomes included the incidence and severity of TP-102-related adverse events, microbiological data, and ulcer healing. Thirteen patients received TP-102. No treatment-related adverse events were reported. Although the study was underpowered to determine the superiority of TP-102 over placebo, a greater proportion of patients in the TP-102 + standard of care (SOC) group showed microbiological reduction of target bacteria (t = 26) compared to the placebo + SOC group (80% versus 50%, p = 1.000). Additionally, a higher proportion of TP-102 patients reached 50% and 75% wound closure compared to placebo (5/7 [71.4%] versus 1/3 [33.3%], p = 0.500 and 2/7 [28.6%] versus none, p = 1.000, respectively). One patient in the TP-102 group achieved wound closure. Conclusions: TP-102 was well tolerated and safe, showing potential as a groundbreaking treatment in this field. Further studies are needed to confirm its safety and efficacy in larger populations with diabetic foot infections (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT04803708). Funding: None to declare.

Original languageEnglish
Article number100565
JournalMed
Volume6
Issue number5
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 9 May 2025
Externally publishedYes

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
    SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being

Keywords

  • Translation to patients
  • bacteriophage
  • clinical trial
  • diabetes
  • diabetic foot ulcers
  • infection
  • phage
  • Bacteriophage therapy
  • Management

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Randomized double-blind study on safety and tolerability of TP-102 phage cocktail in patients with infected and non-infected diabetic foot ulcers'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this