TY - JOUR
T1 - Reliability and Validity of the Global Physical Activity Questionnaire for Portuguese Adults
AU - Ribeiro, Mariana
AU - Fernandes, Elisabete
AU - Borges, Mariana
AU - Pires, Madalena
AU - Melo, Xavier
AU - Pinto, Fausto J.
AU - Abreu, Ana
AU - Pinto, Rita
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© The Author(s) 2024.
PY - 2024/10
Y1 - 2024/10
N2 - The Global Physical Activity Questionnaire (GPAQ) has been used often to assess physical activity (PA) patterns. However, the European Portuguese version of this instrument has not been validated. We aimed to validate the self-administered GPAQ, version 2, (GPAQv2) for Portuguese adults. We included 32 participants in a pilot study of a Portuguese adaptation of the test and 108 participants in an assessment of their PA patterns and sedentary behavior (SB) through the GPAQv2. For its validation, we compared the GPAQv2 to the International PA Questionnaire-Long Form (IPAQ-LF) (concurrent validity) and the ActiGraph wGT3X-BT accelerometer (criterion validity). We evaluated PA and SB at baseline and after seven consecutive days. Test-retest reliability with the Kappa test (k) and the Intraclass Correlation Coefficient (ICC) ranged from strong to almost perfect (k: 0.864–0.976) and from moderate to excellent (ICC: 0.56–0.994), respectively. Concurrent validity, assessed by Spearman’s Correlation Coefficient, was moderate to substantial (rho: 0.471–0.680), and there was fair to substantial criterion validity (rho: 0.226–0.672). Bland-Altman plots showed that the GPAQv2 overestimated vigorous and moderate to vigorous PA and underestimated moderate PA. The largest difference values were related to SB, since the GPAQv2 underestimated sitting time. In sum, we found the GPAQv2 to have acceptable validity and reliability for assessing PA and SB patterns, and we recommend its use for Portuguese adults.
AB - The Global Physical Activity Questionnaire (GPAQ) has been used often to assess physical activity (PA) patterns. However, the European Portuguese version of this instrument has not been validated. We aimed to validate the self-administered GPAQ, version 2, (GPAQv2) for Portuguese adults. We included 32 participants in a pilot study of a Portuguese adaptation of the test and 108 participants in an assessment of their PA patterns and sedentary behavior (SB) through the GPAQv2. For its validation, we compared the GPAQv2 to the International PA Questionnaire-Long Form (IPAQ-LF) (concurrent validity) and the ActiGraph wGT3X-BT accelerometer (criterion validity). We evaluated PA and SB at baseline and after seven consecutive days. Test-retest reliability with the Kappa test (k) and the Intraclass Correlation Coefficient (ICC) ranged from strong to almost perfect (k: 0.864–0.976) and from moderate to excellent (ICC: 0.56–0.994), respectively. Concurrent validity, assessed by Spearman’s Correlation Coefficient, was moderate to substantial (rho: 0.471–0.680), and there was fair to substantial criterion validity (rho: 0.226–0.672). Bland-Altman plots showed that the GPAQv2 overestimated vigorous and moderate to vigorous PA and underestimated moderate PA. The largest difference values were related to SB, since the GPAQv2 underestimated sitting time. In sum, we found the GPAQv2 to have acceptable validity and reliability for assessing PA and SB patterns, and we recommend its use for Portuguese adults.
KW - accelerometer
KW - comparison of methods
KW - physical activity
KW - questionnaires
KW - validity
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85208998836&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1177/00315125241266341
DO - 10.1177/00315125241266341
M3 - Article
C2 - 39045817
AN - SCOPUS:85208998836
SN - 0031-5125
VL - 131
SP - 1548
EP - 1570
JO - Perceptual and Motor Skills
JF - Perceptual and Motor Skills
IS - 5
ER -