Segmental absence of intestinal musculature concerning a child with acute appendicitis

Stéfanie Pereira, Francisco Tortosa, Miroslava Gonçalves

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

3 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Segmental absence of intestinal musculature (SAIM) is a rare histopathologic entity with few described cases, most of which in neonates. Rare reports of pediatric cases have been made. Pathogenesis is still uncertain. This report aims to highlight a pathologic condition that substantially affects the clinical evolution of an abdominal post-operative state as well as the therapeutic approach. We present the case of a 4-year old child, previously healthy, with a 4-day long intestinal obstruction. The exploratory laparotomy demonstrated peritonitis from a necrosed and perforated acute appendicitis. Post-operatory intestinal perforation led to a second laparotomy, with resection of a perforated ileal segment and one with vascular compromise. Pathologic analysis showed segmental absence of intestinal musculature of the small bowel. On a third operative time, resection of the macroscopically injured bowel segments and high protective enterostomy were made. A three years follow-up shows a healthy, well-developed child, who has already undergone enterostomy closure with no intercurrences. Etiology remains to be defined, possibly related to congenital or ischemic acquired defects. It usually manifests in neonates, but we present a case of a 4-year old child. Treatment consists of resection of the injured bowel segments.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)207-210
Number of pages4
JournalJournal of Pediatric Surgery Case Reports
Volume3
Issue number5
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 May 2015
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • Acute appendicitis
  • Intestinal obstruction
  • Intestinal perforation
  • Segmental absence of intestinal musculature

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Segmental absence of intestinal musculature concerning a child with acute appendicitis'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this