Tribological performance of the pair human teeth vs 3D printed zirconia: An in vitro chewing simulation study

A. C. Branco, R. Silva, H. Jorge, T. Santos, K. Lorenz, M. Polido, R. Colaço, A. P. Serro, C. G. Figueiredo-Pina

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

18 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This study aims to evaluate the tribological performance of the pair human teeth/robocasted zirconia, with a special focus on the enamel wear mechanisms. Zirconia pieces produced by robocasting (RC) and unidirectional compression (UC) were compared in terms of crystalline structure, density, porosity, hardness and toughness. Chewing simulation tests were performed against human dental cusps. The cusps wear was quantified and the wear mechanisms identified. Although most of the properties of UC and RC samples are similar, differences were observed for surface roughness and porosity. Although the samples did not suffer wear, the antagonist cusps worn in a similar way. In conclusion, robocasting seems a promising technique to produce customized zirconia dental pieces, namely in what concerns the overall tribological behaviour.

Original languageEnglish
Article number103900
JournalJournal of the Mechanical Behavior of Biomedical Materials
Volume110
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Oct 2020

Keywords

  • Dental zirconia pieces
  • Robocasting
  • Tribological behaviour
  • Unidirectional compressing

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Tribological performance of the pair human teeth vs 3D printed zirconia: An in vitro chewing simulation study'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this