TY - JOUR
T1 - Comparing botulinum toxin and biofeedback therapies for awake bruxism
T2 - a randomized clinical trial
AU - Foscaldo, Tatiana Ferreira
AU - dos Santos Belo Junior, Paulo Henrique
AU - Ribeiro, Giselle Rodrigues
AU - de Proença, Leilane Samary
AU - De la Torre Canales, Giancarlo
AU - Senna, Plinio Mendes
N1 - © 2025. The Author(s).
PY - 2025/11/11
Y1 - 2025/11/11
N2 - Background: Behavioral therapy using electromyography-based biofeedback (BIO) and botulinum toxin type A (BTA) injections are potential treatments for managing awake bruxism (AB) in patients with temporomandibular disorders (TMD). The aim of this study was to compare the effectiveness of BIO and BTA in reducing AB behaviors, pain intensity, and psychosocial distress in individuals with TMD. Methods: This single-center, single-blind, parallel-group randomized clinical trial enrolled 40 adults with TMD diagnosed with AB. AB was assessed using the Oral Behavior Checklist (OBC) and smartphone-based Ecological Momentary Assessment (EMA). Participants presenting an AB frequency of ≥ 60% were randomly allocated to receive BIO or BTA intervention. Pain intensity was measured by the Characteristic Pain Intensity (CPI) score, and psychosocial status was evaluated using the Patient Health Questionnaires (PHQ-9, PHQ-15) and the Generalized Anxiety Disorder questionnaire (GAD-7). Assessments were conducted at baseline, and at 1-, 3-, and 6-month follow-ups. Statistical analyses included Mann–Whitney U for AB behaviors, Wilcoxon Signed Rank test for within-group comparisons, and the Kruskal–Wallis test followed by the Dwass-Steel-Critchlow-Fligner post hoc test for between-group comparisons. Results: Intra-group comparisons showed a significant reduction in BIO group for sustained teeth contact (BIO: p = 0.004) and EMA-assessed AB global behavior (BIO: p = 0.008). No significant improvements were found in BTA group for the same variables in all follow-ups (p > 0.05). However, no significant differences were found between groups in all follow-ups for OBC and EMA scores (p > 0.05). Similarly, there were no significant differences between groups for CPI (p = 0.39) or psychosocial outcomes (p > 0.05). Conclusion: Even though neither intervention improved pain nor psychosocial outcomes, BIO significantly reduced AB behaviors, indicating that BIO may be preferable for controlling AB behaviors in TMD patients. Trial registration: Brazilian Registry of Clinical Trials (ReBEC), RBR-62cftbp. Registered on January 9, 2024.
AB - Background: Behavioral therapy using electromyography-based biofeedback (BIO) and botulinum toxin type A (BTA) injections are potential treatments for managing awake bruxism (AB) in patients with temporomandibular disorders (TMD). The aim of this study was to compare the effectiveness of BIO and BTA in reducing AB behaviors, pain intensity, and psychosocial distress in individuals with TMD. Methods: This single-center, single-blind, parallel-group randomized clinical trial enrolled 40 adults with TMD diagnosed with AB. AB was assessed using the Oral Behavior Checklist (OBC) and smartphone-based Ecological Momentary Assessment (EMA). Participants presenting an AB frequency of ≥ 60% were randomly allocated to receive BIO or BTA intervention. Pain intensity was measured by the Characteristic Pain Intensity (CPI) score, and psychosocial status was evaluated using the Patient Health Questionnaires (PHQ-9, PHQ-15) and the Generalized Anxiety Disorder questionnaire (GAD-7). Assessments were conducted at baseline, and at 1-, 3-, and 6-month follow-ups. Statistical analyses included Mann–Whitney U for AB behaviors, Wilcoxon Signed Rank test for within-group comparisons, and the Kruskal–Wallis test followed by the Dwass-Steel-Critchlow-Fligner post hoc test for between-group comparisons. Results: Intra-group comparisons showed a significant reduction in BIO group for sustained teeth contact (BIO: p = 0.004) and EMA-assessed AB global behavior (BIO: p = 0.008). No significant improvements were found in BTA group for the same variables in all follow-ups (p > 0.05). However, no significant differences were found between groups in all follow-ups for OBC and EMA scores (p > 0.05). Similarly, there were no significant differences between groups for CPI (p = 0.39) or psychosocial outcomes (p > 0.05). Conclusion: Even though neither intervention improved pain nor psychosocial outcomes, BIO significantly reduced AB behaviors, indicating that BIO may be preferable for controlling AB behaviors in TMD patients. Trial registration: Brazilian Registry of Clinical Trials (ReBEC), RBR-62cftbp. Registered on January 9, 2024.
KW - Bruxism
KW - Ecological momentary assessment
KW - Electromyography
KW - Myofascial pain
KW - Psychological biofeedback
KW - Temporomandibular disorders
KW - Single-Blind Method
KW - Humans
KW - Middle Aged
KW - Male
KW - Treatment Outcome
KW - Biofeedback, Psychology/methods
KW - Temporomandibular Joint Disorders/complications
KW - Young Adult
KW - Female
KW - Adult
KW - Neuromuscular Agents/therapeutic use
KW - Botulinum Toxins, Type A/therapeutic use
KW - Bruxism/therapy
KW - Pain Measurement
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/105021423764
U2 - 10.1186/s12903-025-07133-5
DO - 10.1186/s12903-025-07133-5
M3 - Article
C2 - 41219710
AN - SCOPUS:105021423764
SN - 1472-6831
VL - 25
JO - BMC Oral Health
JF - BMC Oral Health
IS - 1
M1 - 1772
ER -