Avançar para navegação principal Avançar para pesquisar Avançar para conteúdo principal

Extraction of pesticides from soil using direct-immersion SPME LC-Tips followed by GC–MS/MS: Evaluation and proof-of-concept

  • João Brinco
  • , Raquel Carvalho
  • , Marco Gomes da Silva
  • , Paula Guedes
  • , Alexandra B. Ribeiro
  • , Eduardo P. Mateus

Resultado de pesquisa: ???type-name??????researchoutput.researchoutputtypes.contributiontojournal.article???revisão de pares

8 Citações (Scopus)

Resumo

A new method was evaluated and developed for the analysis of pesticides in sandy-loam soil by direct-immersion solid phase microextraction (DI-SPME) followed by gas chromatography tandem-mass spectrometry (GC–MS/MS) determination. Ten pesticides were selected based on a literature survey of the compounds reported to be present in EU soils. The extraction was performed using SPME LC-Tips, a new SPME configuration with the coated fibers attached to a disposable and easy-to-handle micropipette tip, which was immersed into a soil slurry made by the addition of an aqueous solution to the soil sample. Ten experimental parameters were evaluated with a Plackett-Burman design, after which the extraction time and percentage of organic solvent in the aqueous extraction were optimized separately. The two fiber chemistries available (PDMS/DVB and C18) were evaluated in parallel for the entire work. In the final method, slurry samples were made by adding an aqueous solution (6 % methanol v/v) to 2 g of soil. The fiber was conditioned and then inserted, for extraction, into the samples, stirred by a magnetic bar. Afterwards, the analytes were desorbed onto 100 µL of methanol. After the addition of analyte protectants (ethylglycerol, gulonolactone, and sorbitol) the extract was injected into the GC–MS/MS system. Isotopically labelled penconazole was used as internal standard. A calibration was performed by extracting spiked soil with analyte concentrations of 0.1–50 µg/kg. Coefficients of determination of the linear calibration were between 0.94–0.98 for the PDMS/DVB and 0.92–0.99 for the C18. Limits of detection range between 0.01–10 µg/kg for the PDMS/DVB and 0.1–10 µg/kg for the C18. Overall, the C18 analytically outperformed the PDMS/DVB but required a longer extraction time (120 min vs 75 min for the PDMS/DVB). This method allows automation and generates low residual toxic waste, having the potential to be introduced as a greener and simpler alternative to currently used sample preparation methodologies.

Idioma original???core.languages.en_GB???
Número do artigo465295
RevistaJournal of Chromatography A
Volume1735
DOIs
Estado da publicação???researchoutput.status.published??? - 25 out. 2024
Publicado externamenteSim

Impressão digital

Mergulhe nos tópicos de investigação de “Extraction of pesticides from soil using direct-immersion SPME LC-Tips followed by GC–MS/MS: Evaluation and proof-of-concept“. Em conjunto formam uma impressão digital única.

Citar isto